As the Supreme Court will be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision has been attained, therefore the decision from the Supreme Court needs for being taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(two) of your Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more

Additionally it is important to note that granting of seniority to some civil servant without the actual length of service virtually violates the whole service structure as a civil servant inducted in Quality seventeen by claiming these kinds of benefit without any experience be directly posted in any higher grade, which is neither the intention of your legislation nor with the equity. Read more

Matter:-HARASSMENT Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Author) Const. P. 5/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Nasira Khalique Thr. Ms. Seema Khalique V/S The Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi CITATION:2025 SHC KHI forty six SHC Citation: SHC-252218 Tag:I have heard the acquired counsel to the parties and perused the record with their assistance. I intentionally not making any detail comments since the issues on the matter between the parties pending adjudication before the concerned court with regard for the interim relief application in terms of Section 7(1) from the Illegal Dispossession Act 2005 at hand over possession on the subjected premises for the petitioner; that Illegal Dispossession Case needs to be decided via the competent court after hearing the parties if pending since the petitioner has already sought a similar prayer inside the Illegal Dispossession case and so far as the restoration of possession of concerned the trial court needs to see this aspect for interim custody of the topic premises If your petitioner was found forcibly evicted from the premises in question if she possessed the valid rent agreement and decision be made within two months from the date of receipt of this order.

Sign up for E-mail Notification of recent opinions The cases listed below have experienced opinions filed for them within the final fourteen times. The following information is readily available for each case: Information Sheet - Click a case number to view case details, like signing JusticesJudges and participating attorneys.

Unfortunately, that was not real. Just two months after being placed with the Roe family, the Roe’s son instructed his parents that the boy had molested him. The boy was arrested two days later, and admitted to having sexually molested the pair’s son several times.

Civil Courts keep jurisdiction over title disputes in partition matters. Agreement to sell does not confer title; it involves legal transfer of title. Agreement to sell must be developed and properly exhibited in evidence. Declining relief based on an unproduced and un-exhibited sale agreement is legally unsustainable. Read more

Within the United States, courts exist on both the federal and state levels. The United States Supreme Court is the highest court during the United States. Lower courts on the federal level include the U.S. Courts of Appeals, U.S. District Courts, the U.S. Court of Claims, as well as U.S. Court of International Trade and U.S. Bankruptcy Courts. Federal courts listen to cases involving matters related to your United States Constitution, other federal laws and regulations, and certain matters that entail parties from different states or countries and large sums of money in dispute. Each and every state has its personal judicial system that consists of trial and appellate courts. The highest court in each state is commonly referred to as being the “supreme” court, Despite the fact that there are some exceptions to this rule, for example, the New York Court of Appeals or case law on succession certificate the Maryland Court of Appeals. State courts generally listen to cases involving state constitutional matters, state regulation and regulations, Whilst state courts may generally hear cases involving federal laws.

However it can be made obvious that police is free to choose action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities subject matter to regulation. However no harassment shall be caused towards the petitioner, if she acts within the bonds of legislation. Police shall also guarantee regard of your family get rid of in accordance with legislation and when they have reasonable ground to prevent the congnizable offence they might act, so far as raiding the house is concerned the police shall safe concrete evidence and procure necessary permission from the concerned high police official/Magistrate being a issue of security on the house is concerned, which is not really public place under the Act 1977. nine. Contemplating the aforementioned details, the objective of filing this petition continues to be obtained. Consequently, this petition is hereby disposed of while in the terms stated higher than. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads forty Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp

161 . Const. P. 642/2023 (D.B.) Fatima Noor V/S Dow University of Health Science and Others Sindh High Court, Karachi Coming to the main case, It is usually a perfectly-founded proposition of regulation that when an inquiry is conducted on charges of misconduct by a public servant, the Court is concerned with determining whether the inquiry was held by a competent officer or whether rules of natural justice are complied with. Whether the findings or conclusions are based on some evidence, the authority entrusted with the power to hold inquiry has jurisdiction, power, and authority to achieve a finding of fact or conclusion. But that finding must be based on some evidence. Neither the technical rules nor proof of a fact or evidence within the Stricto-Sensu, apply to disciplinary proceedings. When the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion acquire support therefrom, the disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent officer is guilty on the charge, however, that is issue into the procedure provided under the relevant rules instead of otherwise, for that reason that the Court in its power of judicial review does not work as appellate authority to re-recognize the evidence and to reach at its independent findings about the evidence.

Binding Precedent – A rule or principle established by a court, which other courts are obligated to abide by.

Matter:-DIRECTION Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi SHC Citation: SHC-252210 Tag:The legislation enjoins the police for being scrupulously fair to the offender as well as Magistracy is to make certain a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the regulation and order situation have been the topic of adverse comments from this Court and also from other courts Nonetheless they have failed to have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The lots of this power casts an obligation within the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for a crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.

If granted absolute immunity, the parties would not only be protected from liability during the matter, but couldn't be answerable in any way for their actions. When the court delayed making this type of ruling, the defendants took their request into the appellate court.

8. For your reasons stated above, this court finds the petition to become without legal or factual foundation and therefore dismisses it. This court concurs with the respondents' position as contend in the comments, and their request is Hence acceded to. All pending applications, if any, will also be dismissed. Read more

The Court holds the authority to review any criminal or civil cases, aside from most civil cases in which the amount in controversy does not exceed $200. It also regulates the legal profession in Washington, and it's issued a Code of Judicial Conduct to guide the actions of state judges.